Objectivism and Perspectivism about the Epistemic Ought
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
an investigation about the relationship between insurance lines and economic growth; the case study of iran
مطالعات قبلی بازار بیمه را به صورت کلی در نظر می گرفتند اما در این مطالعه صنعت بیمه به عنوان متغیر مستفل به بیمه های زندگی و غیر زندگی شکسته شده و هم چنین بیمه های زندگی به رشته های مختلف بیمه ای که در بازار بیمه ایران سهم قابل توجهی دارند تقسیم میشود. با استفاده از روشهای اقتصاد سنجی داده های برای دوره های 48-89 از مراکز ملی داده جمع آوری شد سپس با تخمین مدل خود بازگشتی برداری همراه با تعدادی ...
15 صفحه اولNonfactualism about Epistemic Modality
When I tell you that it’s raining, I describe a way the world is—viz., rainy. I say something factual, something whose truth turns on how things are with some aspect of the world. Likewise when I tell you that the weatherman thinks that it’s raining. Here the truth of what I say turns on a different feature of the world, namely, the weatherman’s state of mind. Likewise when I tell you that I th...
متن کاملTwo claims about epistemic propriety
This paper has two main parts. In the first part, I argue that prominent moves in two related current debates in epistemology—viz., the debates over classical invariantism and the knowledge first movement—depend on one or the other of two claims about epistemic propriety: (1) Impropriety due to lack of a particular epistemic feature suffices for epistemic impropriety; and (2) Having justificati...
متن کاملReasoning about Dynamic Epistemic Logic
We present an algebra and sequent calculus to reason about dynamic epistemic logic, a logic for information update in multi-agent systems. We contribute to it by equipping it with a logical account of resources, a semi-automatic way of reasoning through the algebra and sequent calculus, and finally by generalizing it to non-boolean settings. Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) is a PDL-style logic [1...
متن کاملObjectivism and Interactionism*
The views of linguistic analysts and objectivists are explored with regard to the question of interactionism. It is argued that the admission of a logical difference between explanation by cause and explanation by motive cannot disqualify causal explanations of human action, cannot be construed as challenging the competence of science, and cannot count against interactionism. It is also argued ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2330-4014
DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.005